<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phil Bowyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philbowyer.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philbowyer.com</link>
	<description>Operation: Independence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>State Of The Union Full Text #SOTU</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/state-of-the-union-full-text-sotu/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/state-of-the-union-full-text-sotu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barrack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governemtn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOTU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State OF The Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery State of the Union Address “An America Built to Last” Tuesday, January 24th, 2012 Washington, DC Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans: Last &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/state-of-the-union-full-text-sotu/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery<br />
State of the Union Address<br />
“An America Built to Last”<br />
Tuesday, January 24th, 2012<br />
Washington, DC<br />
 
</p><p>

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:
</p><p>
Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq.  Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought – and several thousand gave their lives.
</p><p>
We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world.  For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq.  For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country.  Most of al Qaeda’s top lieutenants have been defeated.  The Taliban’s momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.
</p><p>
These achievements are a testament to the courage, selflessness, and teamwork of America’s Armed Forces.  At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations.  They’re not consumed with personal ambition.  They don’t obsess over their differences.  They focus on the mission at hand.  They work together. 
</p><p>
Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example.  Think about the America within our reach:  A country that leads the world in educating its people.  An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs.  A future where we’re in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren’t so tied to unstable parts of the world.  An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded. 
</p><p>
We can do this.  I know we can, because we’ve done it before.  At the end of World War II, when another generation of heroes returned home from combat, they built the strongest economy and middle class the world has ever known.  My grandfather, a veteran of Patton’s Army, got the chance to go to college on the GI Bill.  My grandmother, who worked on a bomber assembly line, was part of a workforce that turned out the best products on Earth. 
</p><p>
The two of them shared the optimism of a Nation that had triumphed over a depression and fascism.  They understood they were part of something larger; that they were contributing to a story of success that every American had a chance to share – the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement. 
</p><p>
The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive.  No challenge is more urgent.  No debate is more important.  We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by.  Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.  What’s at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values.  We have to reclaim them. 
</p><p>
Let’s remember how we got here.  Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores.   Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete.  Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that weren’t, and personal debt that kept piling up.
</p><p>
In 2008, the house of cards collapsed.  We learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldn’t afford or understand them.  Banks had made huge bets and bonuses with other people’s money.  Regulators had looked the other way, or didn’t have the authority to stop the bad behavior.
</p><p>
It was wrong.  It was irresponsible.  And it plunged our economy into a crisis that put millions out of work, saddled us with more debt, and left innocent, hard-working Americans holding the bag.  In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs.  And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect. 
</p><p>
Those are the facts.  But so are these.  In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs.  Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005.  American manufacturers are hiring again, creating jobs for the first time since the late 1990s.  Together, we’ve agreed to cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion.  And we’ve put in place new rules to hold Wall Street accountable, so a crisis like that never happens again. 
</p><p>
The state of our Union is getting stronger.  And we’ve come too far to turn back now.  As long as I’m President, I will work with anyone in this chamber to build on this momentum.  But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place. 
</p><p>
No, we will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profits.  Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy that’s built to last – an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.
</p><p>
This blueprint begins with American manufacturing.
</p><p>
On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse.  Some even said we should let it die.  With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen.  In exchange for help, we demanded responsibility.  We got workers and automakers to settle their differences.  We got the industry to retool and restructure.  Today, General Motors is back on top as the world’s number one automaker.  Chrysler has grown faster in the U.S. than any major car company.  Ford is investing billions in U.S. plants and factories.  And together, the entire industry added nearly 160,000 jobs.   
</p><p>
We bet on American workers.  We bet on American ingenuity.  And tonight, the American auto industry is back. 
</p><p>
What’s happening in Detroit can happen in other industries.  It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh.  We can’t bring back every job that’s left our shores.  But right now, it’s getting more expensive to do business in places like China.  Meanwhile, America is more productive.  A few weeks ago, the CEO of Master Lock told me that it now makes business sense for him to bring jobs back home.  Today, for the first time in fifteen years, Master Lock’s unionized plant in Milwaukee is running at full capacity.
</p><p>
So we have a huge opportunity, at this moment, to bring manufacturing back.  But we have to seize it.  Tonight, my message to business leaders is simple:  Ask yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed. 
</p><p>
We should start with our tax code.  Right now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas.  Meanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world.  It makes no sense, and everyone knows it. 
</p><p>
So let’s change it.  First, if you’re a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldn’t get a tax deduction for doing it.  That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home.
</p><p>
Second, no American company should be able to avoid paying its fair share of taxes by moving jobs and profits overseas.  From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax.  And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here.  
</p><p>
Third, if you’re an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut.  If you’re a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here.  And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.
</p><p>
My message is simple.  It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America.  Send me these tax reforms, and I’ll sign them right away.   
</p><p>
We’re also making it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world.  Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years.  With the bipartisan trade agreements I signed into law, we are on track to meet that goal – ahead of schedule.  Soon, there will be millions of new customers for American goods in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea.  Soon, there will be new cars on the streets of Seoul imported from Detroit, and Toledo, and Chicago.     
</p><p>
I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products.  And I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules.  We’ve brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration – and it’s made a difference.  Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires.  But we need to do more.  It’s not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated.  It’s not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they’re heavily subsidized.
</p><p>
Tonight, I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China.  There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders.  And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing finance or new markets like Russia.  Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you – America will always win.
</p><p>
I also hear from many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but can’t find workers with the right skills.  Growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job.  Think about that – openings at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work.   
</p><p>
That’s inexcusable.  And we know how to fix it.  
</p><p>
Jackie Bray is a single mom from North Carolina who was laid off from her job as a mechanic.  Then Siemens opened a gas turbine factory in Charlotte, and formed a partnership with Central Piedmont Community College.  The company helped the college design courses in laser and robotics training.  It paid Jackie’s tuition, then hired her to help operate their plant.
</p><p>
I want every American looking for work to have the same opportunity as Jackie did.  Join me in a national commitment to train two million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job.  My Administration has already lined up more companies that want to help.  Model partnerships between businesses like Siemens and community colleges in places like Charlotte, Orlando, and Louisville are up and running.   Now you need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers – places that teach people skills that local businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing. 
</p><p>
And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need.  It’s time to turn our unemployment system into a reemployment system that puts people to work.   
</p><p>
These reforms will help people get jobs that are open today.  But to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, our commitment to skills and education has to start earlier.
</p><p>
For less than one percent of what our Nation spends on education each year, we’ve convinced nearly every State in the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning – the first time that’s happened in a generation. 
</p><p>
But challenges remain.  And we know how to solve them.
</p><p>
At a time when other countries are doubling down on education, tight budgets have forced States to lay off thousands of teachers.  We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000.  A great teacher can offer an escape from poverty to the child who dreams beyond his circumstance.   Every person in this chamber can point to a teacher who changed the trajectory of their lives.  Most teachers work tirelessly, with modest pay, sometimes digging into their own pocket for school supplies – just to make a difference. 
</p><p>
Teachers matter.  So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, let’s offer schools a deal.  Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and reward the best ones.  In return, grant schools flexibility:  To teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.
</p><p>
We also know that when students aren’t allowed to walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma.  So tonight, I call on every State to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.
</p><p>
When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college.  At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July.  Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars.  And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.
</p><p>
Of course, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid.  We can’t just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we’ll run out of money.  States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets.  And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down.  Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who’ve done just that.  Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly.  Some use better technology.  The point is, it’s possible.  So let me put colleges and universities on notice:  If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down.  Higher education can’t be a luxury – it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.
</p><p>
Let’s also remember that hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge:  The fact that they aren’t yet American citizens.  Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation.  Others came more recently, to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home to invent new products and create new jobs somewhere else. 
</p><p>
That doesn’t make sense.   
</p><p>
I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration. That’s why my Administration has put more boots on the border than ever before.  That’s why there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office. 
</p><p>
The opponents of action are out of excuses.  We should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now.   But if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, and defend this country.  Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship.  I will sign it right away.
</p><p>
You see, an economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country.  That means women should earn equal pay for equal work.  It means we should support everyone who’s willing to work; and every risk-taker and entrepreneur who aspires to become the next Steve Jobs.  
</p><p>
After all, innovation is what America has always been about.  Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses.  So let’s pass an agenda that helps them succeed.  Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow.  Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs.  Both parties agree on these ideas.  So put them in a bill, and get it on my desk this year. 
</p><p>
Innovation also demands basic research.  Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally-financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched.  New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet.  Don’t gut these investments in our budget.  Don’t let other countries win the race for the future.  Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet; to new American jobs and new American industries.  
</p><p>
Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy.  Over the last three years, we’ve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, I’m directing my Administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources.  Right now, American oil production is the highest that it’s been in eight years.  That’s right – eight years.  Not only that – last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.
</p><p>
But with only 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves, oil isn’t enough.  This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy – a strategy that’s cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs. 
</p><p>
We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my Administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy.  Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade.  And I’m requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use.  America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk.
</p><p>
The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy.  And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of thirty years, that helped develop the technologies to extract all this natural gas out of shale rock – reminding us that Government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground.         
 </p><p>
What’s true for natural gas is true for clean energy.  In three years, our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the world’s leading manufacturer of high-tech batteries.  Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled.  And thousands of Americans have jobs because of it. 
 </p><p>
When Bryan Ritterby was laid off from his job making furniture, he said he worried that at 55, no one would give him a second chance.  But he found work at Energetx, a wind turbine manufacturer in Michigan.  Before the recession, the factory only made luxury yachts.  Today, it’s hiring workers like Bryan, who said, “I’m proud to be working in the industry of the future.”
 </p><p>
Our experience with shale gas shows us that the payoffs on these public investments don’t always come right away.  Some technologies don’t pan out; some companies fail.  But I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy.  I will not walk away from workers like Bryan.  I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or Germany because we refuse to make the same commitment here.  We have subsidized oil companies for a century.  That’s long enough.  It’s time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that’s rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that’s never been more promising.   Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs.   
 </p><p>
We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives.  The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change.  But there’s no reason why Congress shouldn’t at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation.  So far, you haven’t acted.  Well tonight, I will.  I’m directing my Administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes.  And I’m proud to announce that the Department of Defense, the world’s largest consumer of energy, will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history – with the Navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year.
 </p><p>
Of course, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy.  So here’s another proposal:  Help manufacturers eliminate energy waste in their factories and give businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings.  Their energy bills will be $100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them.  Send me a bill that creates these jobs. 
 </p><p>
Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair America’s infrastructure.  So much of America needs to be rebuilt.  We’ve got crumbling roads and bridges.  A power grid that wastes too much energy.  An incomplete high-speed broadband network that prevents a small business owner in rural America from selling her products all over the world. 
 </p><p>
During the Great Depression, America built the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge.  After World War II, we connected our States with a system of highways.  Democratic and Republican administrations invested in great projects that benefited everybody, from the workers who built them to the businesses that still use them today.
 </p><p>
In the next few weeks, I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects.  But you need to fund these projects.  Take the money we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.
 </p><p>
There’s never been a better time to build, especially since the construction industry was one of the hardest-hit when the housing bubble burst.  Of course, construction workers weren’t the only ones hurt.  So were millions of innocent Americans who’ve seen their home values decline.  And while Government can’t fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldn’t have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.  
 </p><p>
That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates.  No more red tape.  No more runaround from the banks.  A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.
 </p><p>
Let’s never forget:  Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a Government and a financial system that do the same.  It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom:  No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts.  An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody. 
 </p><p>
We’ve all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them, and buyers who knew they couldn’t afford them.  That’s why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior.  Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, don’t destroy the free market.  They make the free market work better.   
 </p><p>
There is no question that some regulations are outdated, unnecessary, or too costly.  In fact, I’ve approved fewer regulations in the first three years of my presidency than my Republican predecessor did in his.  I’ve ordered every federal agency to eliminate rules that don’t make sense.  We’ve already announced over 500 reforms, and just a fraction of them will save business and citizens more than $10 billion over the next five years.  We got rid of one rule from 40 years ago that could have forced some dairy farmers to spend $10,000 a year proving that they could contain a spill – because milk was somehow classified as an oil.  With a rule like that, I guess it was worth crying over spilled milk.   
 </p><p>
I’m confident a farmer can contain a milk spill without a federal agency looking over his shoulder.  But I will not back down from making sure an oil company can contain the kind of oil spill we saw in the Gulf two years ago.  I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury pollution, or making sure that our food is safe and our water is clean.  I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men. 
 </p><p>
And I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules.  The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial system’s core purpose:  Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, start a business, or send a kid to college.
 </p><p>
So if you’re a big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to make risky bets with your customers’ deposits.  You’re required to write out a “living will” that details exactly how you’ll pay the bills if you fail – because the rest of us aren’t bailing you out ever again.  And if you’re a mortgage lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of signing people up for products they can’t afford with confusing forms and deceptive practices are over.  Today, American consumers finally have a watchdog in Richard Cordray with one job: To look out for them. 
 </p><p>

We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect people’s investments.  Some financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because there’s no real penalty for being a repeat offender.  That’s bad for consumers, and it’s bad for the vast majority of bankers and financial service professionals who do the right thing.  So pass legislation that makes the penalties for fraud count. 

 </p><p>

And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans. 

 </p><p>
A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy.  But it should also guide us as we look to pay down our debt and invest in our future.
 </p><p>
Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile.  People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year.  There are plenty of ways to get this done.  So let’s agree right here, right now:  No side issues.  No drama.  Pass the payroll tax cut without delay. 
 </p><p>
When it comes to the deficit, we’ve already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings.  But we need to do more, and that means making choices.  Right now, we’re poised to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was supposed to be a temporary tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans.  Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households.  Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.  
 </p><p>
Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans?  Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else – like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans?  Because if we’re serious about paying down our debt, we can’t do both.  
 </p><p>
The American people know what the right choice is.  So do I.  As I told the Speaker this summer, I’m prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors. 
 </p><p>
But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes.  Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule:  If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes.  And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right:  Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires.  In fact, if you’re earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn’t get special tax subsidies or deductions.  On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn’t go up.  You’re the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages.  You’re the ones who need relief.   
 </p><p>
Now, you can call this class warfare all you want.  But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes?  Most Americans would call that common sense. 
 </p><p>
We don’t begrudge financial success in this country.  We admire it.  When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it’s not because they envy the rich.  It’s because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don’t need and the country can’t afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference – like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet.  That’s not right.  Americans know it’s not right.  They know that this generation’s success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their country’s future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility.  That’s how we’ll reduce our deficit.  That’s an America built to last.  
 </p><p>
I recognize that people watching tonight have differing views about taxes and debt; energy and health care.  But no matter what party they belong to, I bet most Americans are thinking the same thing right now:  Nothing will get done this year, or next year, or maybe even the year after that, because Washington is broken. 
 </p><p>
Can you blame them for feeling a little cynical? 
 </p><p>
The greatest blow to confidence in our economy last year didn’t come from events beyond our control.  It came from a debate in Washington over whether the United States would pay its bills or not.  Who benefited from that fiasco?  
 </p><p>
I’ve talked tonight about the deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street.  But the divide between this city and the rest of the country is at least as bad – and it seems to get worse every year.
 </p><p>
Some of this has to do with the corrosive influence of money in politics.  So together, let’s take some steps to fix that.  Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow.  Let’s limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact.  Let’s make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can’t lobby Congress, and vice versa – an idea that has bipartisan support, at least outside of Washington. 
 </p><p>
Some of what’s broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days.  A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything – even routine business – passed through the Senate.  Neither party has been blameless in these tactics.  Now both parties should put an end to it.  For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.
 </p><p>
The executive branch also needs to change.  Too often, it’s inefficient, outdated and remote.  That’s why I’ve asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people. 
 </p><p>
Finally, none of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town.  We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction; that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas. 
 </p><p>
I’m a Democrat.  But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed:  That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more.  That’s why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States.  That’s why we’re getting rid of regulations that don’t work.  That’s why our health care law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program. 
 </p><p>
On the other hand, even my Republican friends who complain the most about Government spending have supported federally-financed roads, and clean energy projects, and federal offices for the folks back home. 
 </p><p>
The point is, we should all want a smarter, more effective Government.  And while we may not be able to bridge our biggest philosophical differences this year, we can make real progress.  With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow.  But I can do a whole lot more with your help.  Because when we act together, there is nothing the United States of America can’t achieve. 
 </p><p>
That is the lesson we’ve learned from our actions abroad over the last few years.
 </p><p>
Ending the Iraq war has allowed us to strike decisive blows against our enemies.  From Pakistan to Yemen, the al Qaeda operatives who remain are scrambling, knowing that they can’t escape the reach of the United States of America.
 </p><p>
From this position of strength, we’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan.  Ten thousand of our troops have come home.  Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer. This transition to Afghan lead will continue, and we will build an enduring partnership with Afghanistan, so that it is never again a source of attacks against America.
 </p><p>
As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the Middle East and North Africa, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sana’a to Tripoli.  A year ago, Qadhafi was one of the world’s longest-serving dictators – a murderer with American blood on his hands.  Today, he is gone.  And in Syria, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change can’t be reversed, and that human dignity can’t be denied.
 </p><p>
How this incredible transformation will end remains uncertain.  But we have a huge stake in the outcome.  And while it is ultimately up to the people of the region to decide their fate, we will advocate for those values that have served our own country so well.  We will stand against violence and intimidation. We will stand for the rights and dignity of all human beings – men and women; Christians, Muslims, and Jews.  We will support policies that lead to strong and stable democracies and open markets, because tyranny is no match for liberty.
 </p><p>
And we will safeguard America’s own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests.  Look at Iran.  Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program now stands as one.  The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent.  Let there be no doubt:  America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal.  But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.
 </p><p>
The renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe.  Our oldest alliances in Europe and Asia are stronger than ever.  Our ties to the Americas are deeper.  Our iron-clad commitment to Israel’s security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history.  We’ve made it clear that America is a Pacific power, and a new beginning in Burma has lit a new hope. From the coalitions we’ve built to secure nuclear materials, to the missions we’ve led against hunger and disease; from the blows we’ve dealt to our enemies; to the enduring power of our moral example, America is back. 
 </p><p>
Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn’t know what they’re talking about.  That’s not the message we get from leaders around the world, all of whom are eager to work with us.  That’s not how people feel from Tokyo to Berlin; from Cape Town to Rio; where opinions of America are higher than they’ve been in years.  Yes, the world is changing; no, we can’t control every event.  But America remains the one indispensable nation in world affairs – and as long as I’m President, I intend to keep it that way. 
 </p><p>
That’s why, working with our military leaders, I have proposed a new defense strategy that ensures we maintain the finest military in the world, while saving nearly half a trillion dollars in our budget.  To stay one step ahead of our adversaries, I have already sent this Congress legislation that will secure our country from the growing danger of cyber-threats.
 </p><p>
Above all, our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it.  As they come home, we must serve them as well as they served us.  That includes giving them the care and benefits they have earned – which is why we’ve increased annual VA spending every year I’ve been President.  And it means enlisting our veterans in the work of rebuilding our Nation.
 </p><p>
With the bipartisan support of this Congress, we are providing new tax credits to companies that hire vets.  Michelle and Jill Biden have worked with American businesses to secure a pledge of 135,000 jobs for veterans and their families.  And tonight, I’m proposing a Veterans Job Corps that will help our communities hire veterans as cops and firefighters, so that America is as strong as those who defend her.
 </p><p>
Which brings me back to where I began.  Those of us who’ve been sent here to serve can learn from the service of our troops.  When you put on that uniform, it doesn’t matter if you’re black or white; Asian or Latino; conservative or liberal; rich or poor; gay or straight.  When you’re marching into battle, you look out for the person next to you, or the mission fails.  When you’re in the thick of the fight, you rise or fall as one unit, serving one Nation, leaving no one behind.
 </p><p>
One of my proudest possessions is the flag that the SEAL Team took with them on the mission to get bin Laden.  On it are each of their names.  Some may be Democrats.  Some may be Republicans.  But that doesn’t matter.  Just like it didn’t matter that day in the Situation Room, when I sat next to Bob Gates – a man who was George Bush’s defense secretary; and Hillary Clinton, a woman who ran against me for president. 
 </p><p>
All that mattered that day was the mission.  No one thought about politics.  No one thought about themselves.  One of the young men involved in the raid later told me that he didn’t deserve credit for the mission.  It only succeeded, he said, because every single member of that unit did their job – the pilot who landed the helicopter that spun out of control; the translator who kept others from entering the compound; the troops who separated the women and children from the fight; the SEALs who charged up the stairs.  More than that, the mission only succeeded because every member of that unit trusted each other – because you can’t charge up those stairs, into darkness and danger, unless you know that there’s someone behind you, watching your back.
 </p><p>
So it is with America.  Each time I look at that flag, I’m reminded that our destiny is stitched together like those fifty stars and those thirteen stripes.  No one built this country on their own.  This Nation is great because we built it together.  This Nation is great because we worked as a team.  This Nation is great because we get each other’s backs.  And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard.  As long as we’re joined in common purpose, as long as we maintain our common resolve, our journey moves forward, our future is hopeful, and the state of our Union will always be strong.
 </p><p>
Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/state-of-the-union-full-text-sotu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Founding Fathers Warned Us</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/our-founding-fathers-warned-us/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/our-founding-fathers-warned-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Control Of Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just listened to Romney's speech from last night. It made me think of the Federalist papers. Many candidates refer to the Constitution. They say they will restore it, and it's "our blueprint". When Romney says that, he's right, however &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/our-founding-fathers-warned-us/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
I just listened to Romney's speech from last night. It made me think of the Federalist papers.
</p><p>
Many candidates refer to the Constitution. They say they will restore it, and it's "our blueprint". When Romney says that, he's right, however that's where the truth stops, and not just with him, but every single candidate out there. I wonder which version of the Constitution these guys are referring to; the one in their head or the one on paper written by our Founding Fathers. 
</p><p>
As I said, I thought about the Federalist Papers while listening to Romney's speech.  In the very first letter, Hamilton warned against <strong>attempts to influence without evidence of truth</strong>. 
</p>
<p>
He went on to say:
</p>

<p class=quote>
"Those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants"
</p><p>
For the last couple of decades at least, this is what we have been experiencing. We have been at war with two other nations, on the brink of two more, and poking our nose into countries like Egypt, Tunisia and Syria to "end the tyranny". 
</p><p><img src="http://philbowyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/300px-Declaration_independence.jpg" alt="" title="300px-Declaration_independence" width="300" height="197" style="margin-right:10px;margin-bottom:5px" align=left valign=top class=img />
Romney said in the last debate that he would re-enter Iraq right now. 
</p><p>
These candidates (including Obama) offer no evidence. They offer no truth. They fit the textbook definition of a demagogue by using passion ("Obama is a socialist"/religion), emotion (I will fix the economy, w/out saying how) and prejudicies (gay rights/family values/religion) to win their power.  
</p><p>
In the second letter, John Jay warned against those fighting for separate sovereignties "without truths or sound policies". That sounds a lot like Ron Paul to me arguing that everything be left to the states. 
</p><p>
The purpose of the Union was to create a Nation with power, security and unity. The idea wasn't to break it up "EU Style". The 10th Amendment doesn't say that certain things SHOULD be left to the states, it says that if it's not covered here, the states CAN do it.
</p><p>
I got into it a little bit with someone last night regarding my views on Obama. I brought out the truth on what he has done, and that I didn't feel he was the best man  to go forward. I was called a "Paulbot", and I was called "an Idiot". I have a thick skin, I can take the name calling because I understand where that comes from. The name calling starts when facts are absent and your only retort is "you're a poopy face". I get it. 
</p><p>
While my feelings aren't hurt, nor is my determination, I am saddened and fearful that the truth is becoming something you see on the history channel. An element of realism but mostly puppy dogs and rainbows so it doesn't look as bad as it really is. Reality and truth is often a hard pill to swallow, but swallow it we must. 

Take a look around. This is what is going on around you (and what you won't seen on the evening news):
</p><p>
<ul>
<li> Protesters are being arrested for obeying the law. 
<li> Kids, as young as 6 years old are being arrested or fined in school for acting out (that's what kids do). 
<li> Journalism is becoming a distant memory as big multinational corporations buy up the news outlets and control what the news <i>really</i> is.  
<li> Our government is assassinating American citizens, unlawfully detaining them, and passed a law to make it all  legal.
<li> They are about to pass even more legislation that will strip you of your citizenship if they think you are hostile to the government. 
<li> Half of Americans or on the poverty line because our system is so rampant with corruption. 
<li> The Internet that has been instrumental in our economy and our communication is threatened because, in my opinion, it gives too much power to the people (more on that later in a separate post). 
</ul>
</p><p>
Everyday I wake to a news item that brings the rage out in me.  Today it was kids being abused in two different stories. First, how Texas is criminalizing bad behavior in school, the other about how parents used their young children to demonstrate against abortion. 
</p><p>
It's time to rethink our system, and gather together to put a stop to the injustices being done to all of us. Occupy is a start, but we need to do more. We need more action. Even though we may disagree on certain things, I believe we can all find common ground. I believe we can set aside our differences, embrace truth and logic, and fight for what's right. 
</p>
<p>
In 1789, the odds were in our favor. They can be again, but much like the years between 1776 and 1789 freedom will come at a cost. Sacrifices will need to be made. Minds will need to brainstorm real solutions that benefit the many. We need a complete rethinking of what American life is, and what it can be.  We can begin this process by:
</p><p>
<ul>
<li> Sharing knowledge with each other.
<li> Opening our minds and sharing ideas. 
<li> Embracing humanity.
<li> Acting on truth only and staying clear of tall-tales (there's enough bad stuff out there, we don't need to make anything up, or embellish the truth).
</ul>
</p><p>
It's time to Occupy America and re-Declare our Independence.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/our-founding-fathers-warned-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernie Sanders vs. Citizen&#8217;s United</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/bernie-sanders-vs-citizens-united/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/bernie-sanders-vs-citizens-united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Control Of Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Personhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We've been conditioned to think that the Citizen's United ruling made everything "bad" and since then the People lost all of our power in government. That's simply not true." Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has introduced a bill that is aimed at &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/bernie-sanders-vs-citizens-united/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section>
<article class=blogpost>
<div>

<p class=quote>
"We've been conditioned to think that the Citizen's United ruling made everything "bad" and since then the People lost all of our power in government. That's simply not true."
</p>
<p>
Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has introduced a bill that is aimed at "taking on big money" and restoring democracy back to the People.
</p>

<p>
I hate to be a Debbie Downer, but this is not a bill worth supporting, and rather than praising Bernie for a job well done, we should be yelling at him for creating a bill that has more holes in it than a strainer. 
</p>

<img src="http://philbowyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/berniesanders.jpg" alt="" title="berniesanders" width="380"  />
<p>
While the Citizen's United was an important ruling, it did nothing more than make legal what was already happening. Bernie's bill does not STOP CORPORATIONS FROM GIVING  GOV'T OFFICIALS MONEY, it just overturns the CU ruling.
</p>

<h3>History</h3>
<p>
Big media (including the likes of Jon Stewart) like to over emphasize the importance of the CU ruling. We've been conditioned to think that this ruling made everything "bad" and since then the People lost all of our power in government.
</p>

<p>
But wait a minute... this was happening long before the case was even heard. 
</p>

<p>
I know time is in short supply so I'll cut to the chase. Back in the 80's and 90's Jack Abramoff was "buying officials".  Companies would use him to get around the campaign finance laws so they could influence government.  Even before that, 1913 the Federal Reserve came to town. This PRIVATE company, run by wealthy bankers dictated how banking would be done, and has been controlling the economy ever since, including causing both of the most financial collapses in our history. Most of you probably don't remember living in the great depression in the 30's, but I know you're well aware of the financial mess we're in now thanks to the collapse in 2008. 
</p>
<P><strong>
The Citizen's United case was in 2009, and ruled on in 2010!</p></strong>

<p>
All CU did was make it easier for corporations to do what they already were doing. Bernie's bill isn't going to change anything. It will only make it harder, taking them back to pre-2010 ways of buying our government. 
</p>

<p>
So, you see, Bernie's bill is all for show. It doesn't strike at the cause of the problem, which is how campaigns are financed. It doesn't prevent money from influencing politics, it just makes it a tiny bit harder - maybe.  
</p>
</div></article></section>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/bernie-sanders-vs-citizens-united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA Shows How Corporations Dictate Policy</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/sopa-shows-how-corporations-dictate-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/sopa-shows-how-corporations-dictate-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Control Of Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamar Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenAct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The entertainment industries (tv, movies, music) gave $640,160 to the Judiciary Committee." Occupy Wall Street is a movement that is focused on removing "Big Business" from controlling our government. There is a lot of confusion about the movement, and some &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/sopa-shows-how-corporations-dictate-policy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section>
<article class=blogpost>
<div>

<p class=quote>
"The entertainment industries (tv, movies, music) gave $640,160 to the Judiciary Committee."
</p>

<p>
Occupy Wall Street is a movement that is focused on removing "Big Business" from controlling our government. There is a lot of confusion about the movement, and some believe OWS is against corporations in general and/or capitalism. This is simply not true. I am a "member" of the Occupy Movement and I own and operate a small corporation, and two smaller businesses. I do my best to support local corporations, especially the ones attempting to add value to the community they serve. OWS is about stopping huge corporations that abuse their wealth to benefit only themselves. 
</p>
<p>
After watching the SOPA Markup in the Judiciary Committee last week, it was stunning to see Amendment after Amendment voted down. Many of these Amendments made sense, but also neutered the bill. I also watched as pleas for fact-finding hearings to take place to retain advice and counsel by experts were met with deaf ears. It was obvious that something more was going on here. It wasn't about the merits of an amendment, or even logic. Melvin Watt (D-NC) at one point actually acknowledged that they didn't know what they were doing, but they should pass the bill anyway. When presented with letters from the architects of the Internet (Vince Cerf and others), Mr. Watt said that while he's no nerd, he doesn't believe them. 
</p>

<p>
My jaw dropped as I watched logic and reason fly out of the window in favor of... what? What could possibly cause this type of behavior? 
</p>
<p>
Money and Greed. 
</p><p>
Darrell Issa (R-CA) actually called out Chairman (and SOPA author) Lamar Smith (R-TX) for his unfairness saying, "it's clear we aren't going to win".
</p>

<p>
I decided to connect the dots and show how this greed, by both the entertainment industry and our politicians, is creating policy that hurts the citizens of the United States. Using the site OpenSecrets, I researched the outspoken people, on both sides of the bill, to see how they were/are influenced.
</p>
<img src="http://philbowyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/lamarsmith.jpg" alt="" title="lamarsmith" width="380"  />
<h3>Lamar Smith, Chairman and SOPA Author (R-TX) </h3>
<p> Lamar Smith has been very dutiful when it comes to shooting down every amendment that comes his way, and encouraging his colleagues to vote the same way he does. It is clear he wants SOPA to pass "as is", not because of ego, but because he's paid to do so:
</p>

<p><strong>Contributions by "TV, Movies & Music"</strong><br/>
2010 Contribution: $141,850 (#3 on their list)<br/>
2012 Contribution: $86,800 (#1 on their list)
</p>

<P>So, it would <i>appear</i> that, if you have nearly a quarter of a million dollars ($228,650) to spend, you can pay a politician to draft legislation that would help your business. </p>
<p>
So lets move on to the other more vocal proponents of SOPA (and opponents to all logical Amendments that would allow the Internet to operate and prevent censorship and abuse). The numbers below are contributions by the movie/tv/music industries. 
</p>
<h3>Howard Berman (D-CA) </h3>
<p>
2010 Contribution: $286,400<br/>
2012 Contribution: $183,460
</p>

<P>It's also interesting to note that his top 3 contributors are <i>News Corp</i>, <i>Time Warner</i> and <i>Disney</i>.</p>

<h3>Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) </h3>
<p>
2010 Contribution: $66,000<br/>
2012 Contribution: $59,500
</p>


<h3>James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) </h3>
<p>
2010 Contribution: $33,500 (His top contributor)<br/>
2012 Contribution: $13,000 (His top contributor)
</p>


<h3> Melvin Watt (D-NC) </h3>
<p>
2012 Contribution: $13,500
</p>


<h3> Maxine Waters(D-CA) </h3>
<p>
2012 Contribution: $12,000
</p>

<p>
That covers the more vocal proponents of the bill, now let's take a look at the Congressmen who oppose the bill, and have worked feverishly to submit amendments that would insert some logic into the bill.
</p>
<h3>The Coin's Other Side</h3>
<p>
The following representatives have NOT received money from the "TV, Movie and Music" industry for their 2010 or 2012 campaigns, and are vocally against the bill:
</p>

<p><strong>
&rarr; Jason Chaffetz (R-UT)<br/>
&rarr;  Darrell Issa (R-CA)<br/>
&rarr;  Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX)<br/>
&rarr;  Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)<br/>
&rarr;  Jared Polis (D-CO)<br/>
</p>

<p>
On the flip side, Darrell Issa has authored the OpenAct, which is a version of "SOPA without the harmful side affects". He did not receive any contributions from the computer industry in 2012, however he did receive nearly $75,000 in 2010, but wasn't a top contributor. 
</p>

<p>Another Representative that has received money from the "computers/Internet" industry is Zoe Lofgren. Ms. Lofgren has racked up more than $220,000 in her last two campaigns (2010-$152k / 2012-$70K). Oracle was her top contributor. 
</p>
<p>
Another interesting little tidbit I ran across was that Presidential Candidate Michelle Bachmann has received a lot of money from the entertainment industry. In her last 3 campaigns she has made nearly $57,000 (2008-2012)! 
</p>

<p>
It's very clear to me how the votes fall. They are based on money. Who pays, wins. Regular citizens cannot compete with the numbers shelled out by large multi-national corporations that throw morals and ethics aside in order to business their way. 
</p>

<p>
The numbers on this post are just a fraction of the dollars being spent to influence our politicians. It's not out of the ordinary to see these numbers in the millions of dollars PER OFFICIAL in contributions from large corporations, or should I say "people". 
</p>

<p>
This kind of corruption needs to stop, and it's up to us to stop it. Please share this post with someone who thinks they are the "53%" or doesn't think Occupy stands for them. While I know this post doesn't provide "proof beyond a reasonable doubt", it should at least cause you to question what is going on and begin the process of connecting the dots towards the truth. 
</p>

</div>
</article>
</section>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/sopa-shows-how-corporations-dictate-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA &#8211; Judiciary Committee Live Blog</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/sopa-live-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/sopa-live-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Control Of Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTernet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Live blog of the SOPA Judiciary Commitee Markup. Yes, I'm going to be calling it like I see it. December 16th Day 2 of the SOPA Judiciary Committee Mark Up. Times listed are Eastern 10:45 These assclowns just voted to &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/sopa-live-blog/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Live blog of the SOPA Judiciary Commitee Markup. Yes, I'm going to be calling it like I see it. 
</p>

<h2>December 16th</h2>
<p>Day 2 of the SOPA Judiciary Committee Mark Up. Times listed are Eastern</p>
<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">10:45</h5>
<p>
These assclowns just voted to pass a SOPA amendment that would allow an ISP/Hosting provider to take an entire site down, when only a subdomain infringes. 
</p><p>
In other words, if you have a blogger account or wordpress.com account, and you use a subdomain, ie. yoursite.wordpress.com, then your are at a major risk of going down because of the actions of others. 
</p><p>
If someone on has a site theirname.wordpress.com, and they have a file that is infringing, SOPA will allow the ISP to shut down the entire wordpress.com site - including your site, rather than just the infringing subdomain. 
</p><p>
This amendment was written by Goodlatte, and I would urge everyone to call his office and tell him what an idiot he is, and he should not be re-elected. 
</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">10:47</h5>

<p>Debating Mr. Sensenbrenner's Amendment regarding a private right of action.</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">11:03</h5>
<p>Voting on Sensenbrenner's amendment (roll call on voting).</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">11:06</h5>
<p>Ammendment Failed to pass: 8-22</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">11:07</h5>
<p>Committee is in recess due to other voting and a caucus until 1PM ET</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">Recap of Morning 11:13</h5>
<p>We heard two amendments, one passed and one failed. </p>

<p>Mr. Issa admonished the Chairman, Mr. Smith, telling him that "It's clear we will lose eventually" and illustrated how disappointed he was that things were getting passed without the proper information and knowledge. He went on to insert a <a href=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/internet-inventors-warn-against-sopa-and-pipa>letter</a> into the record by the architects of the Internet and read a passage by Vint Cerf. 
As Mr. Issa was reading some of the people contained in the letter, someone yelled out "Is Al Gore in there?". 
</p>

<p>
Sound like this is going to be a repeat of Day one, all the amendments that would make SOPA tollerable will fail, the ones that keep SOPA intact will pass. 
</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:05</h5>

<p>Roll call.</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:11</h5>

<p>People still milling about, roll call is continuing</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:14</h5>
<p>
14 members present, working quorum

</p>


<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:15</h5>

<P>Mr. Chaifets (sp) Amendment being heard. Relating to concerns with DNS and CyberSecurity. </p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:17</h5>
<p>Reading letters from "Internet Guru's" that claim the bill poses a serious risk to the internet and security and functionality.</p>



<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:20</h5>
<p>Mr. Chaifets (sp) is willing to withdraw the amendment on the condition on having hearings to determine what affects the bill would have on the Internet, and to get some clarificiation.
</p>


<p>The Chairman is "taking it under consideration". </p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:21</h5>
<p>The Amendment is not withdrawn yet, Ms. Lofgren is now arguing her point (agreement w/ amendment).

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:23</h5>
<p>Ms. Lofgren agrees that a hearing should be made to get clarification</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:25</h5>
<p>Mr. Watt is opposing the amendment, but is in support if a hearing.</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:27</h5>

<p>Ms. Jackson-Lee is now encouraging a hearing.</p>

<p>The Amendment is withdrawn.</p>

<h5 style="margin-bottom:1px;">1:28</h5>

<p>The committee is adjourned until the next practical day congress is back in session (which I believe is next year??). 
</p>

<p>This concludes the live blog, but the fight isn't over. Take some time this weekend to <a href=http://philbowyer.com/proud-sponsors-of-internet-censorship-sopa/>contact the people</a> actually responsible for the bill. It's isn't your congressmen, it's the corporations in the entertainment industry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/sopa-live-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proud Sponsors of Internet Censorship (SOPA)</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/proud-sponsors-of-internet-censorship-sopa/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/proud-sponsors-of-internet-censorship-sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) is expected to clear a "closed-door-secret-committee" this week, which means it could pass the House by late this week or early next week. This is a very dangerous bill that could essentially censor the &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/proud-sponsors-of-internet-censorship-sopa/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section>
<article class=blogpost>
<div>
<p>
So, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) is expected to clear a "closed-door-secret-committee" this week, which means it could pass the House by late this week or early next week. This is a very dangerous bill that could essentially censor the Internet and hurt the small businesses that rely on it for a living. 
</p>
<p>
It's not just about fighting piracy, as the bill allows the government to shut down a website without due process is it's even SUSPECTED of infringing on copyright or trademarks. No proof is needed.
</p>

<P>
I've been working with musicians and authors for about five years now. As a result, I have a wealth of copyrighted material on my servers, which are there by permission. Musicians often send me songs for my input, for promotional purposes, or to distribute. While I do not own the copyright on these songs, I have permission by the owner to possess and distribute/promote their music. Under this law, the RIAA can say that my site has infringing copyright material on it, and poof - it's gone. No way to prove I have rights to use it, nothing. They don't even have to own the copyright (I only work with Indie, non RIAA/Label bands)!
</p>

<p>
The other thing you can do is share this article and it's message with everyone you know. Tell them to fight for an open and free internet. Make companies use existing laws to counter piracy, not create new laws that kill the internet just so they don't have to adapt. 
</p>

<p>
I've written my congressman and received the usual bull-shit "I didn't really read your letter cause I could care less what you have to say" form letter. There's a lot of people telling you to do this, but I really don't think it matters to these guys. It doesn't matter because We The People no longer have a voice in what happens. 
</p>

<p>
Here's a list of the heavy-weights that support SOPA. These are companies you support every day, every time you turn on the radio or television, or go to a movie. I have stopped supporting them - ALL OF THEM - and will only support Independent artists who believe in creating art is ultimately for the fan, not for corporate profit. 
</p>

<p>
ABC<br />
AFTRA – American Federation of Television and Radio Artists<br />
AFM – American Federation of Musicians<br />
AAP – Association of American Publishers<br />
ASCAP<br />
BMG Chrysalis<br />
BMI<br />
CBS Corporation<br />
Cengage Learning<br />
DGA – Directors Guild of America<br />
Disney Publishing Worldwide, Inc.<br />
EMI Music Publishing<br />
ESPN<br />
Graphic Artists Guild<br />
Hachette Book Group<br />
HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C.<br />
Hyperion<br />
IATSE – International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, its Territories and Canada<br />
International Brotherhood of Teamsters<br />
Kaufman Astoria Studios<br />
Macmillan<br />
Major League Baseball<br />
Marvel Entertainment, LLC<br />
McGraw-Hill Education<br />
MPA – The Association of Magazine Media<br />
NFL – National Football League<br />
National Music Publishers’ Association<br />
NBCUniversal<br />
News Corporation<br />
New York Production Alliance<br />
New York State AFL-CIO<br />
Pearson Education<br />
Penguin Group (USA), Inc.<br />
The Perseus Books Group<br />
Producers Guild of America East<br />
Random House<br />
Reed Elsevier<br />
SAG – Screen Actors Guild<br />
Scholastic, Inc.<br />
Silvercup Studios<br />
Simon & Schuster, Inc.<br />
Sony Music Entertainment<br />
Sony/ATV Music Publishing<br />
Time Warner Inc.<br />
United States Tennis Association<br />
Universal Music Group<br />
Universal Music Publishing Group<br />
Viacom<br />
Warner Music Group<br />
W.W. Norton & Company<br />
Wolters Kluwer
</p>
<p>Credit to Seth Godin for compiling this list, and is far from complete as notables such as Apple, Nintendo, Microsoft and AVG are missing. </p>

<h2>What You Can Do - Call To Action</h2>
<p>I made the mistake of writing my government, but like OWS, we need to focus on where the problem starts - the corporations. Write to them and tell them you will not buy their products, watch their shows, or listen to their music unless they withdraw support for SOPA, and use their muscle to help stop the bill's passage. 
</p>
<p> Yes, I know it's work, but take a moment to imagine a world without YouTube, Facebook, Google+, Google, Twitter, Yahoo (OK we could live w/out Yahoo) or your favorite website. Imagine the risk your own site has because if you link to site that infringes, your site could also be taken down. 
</p>
</div></article></section>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/proud-sponsors-of-internet-censorship-sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and the National Defense Authorization Act</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/obama-and-the-national-defense-authorization-act/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/obama-and-the-national-defense-authorization-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Police State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defense Authorization Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill currently doesn't provide the President with unlimited power to stop a terrorist threat. This is why he will veto it, not because it will make the Constitution null and void. Most United States Citizens aren't aware that their &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/obama-and-the-national-defense-authorization-act/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<article class=blogpost>
<section>
<div>
<p class=quote>
The bill currently doesn't provide the President with unlimited power to stop a terrorist threat. This is why he will veto it, not because it will make the Constitution null and void. 
</p>

<p>
Most United States Citizens aren't aware that their rights under the Constitution are at risk. Many sit back with their big screen televisions watching some lame-ass show created by the entertainment industry to distract us from the reality. When I say "lame-ass" I mean shows that actually dumb you down, the huge number of reality shows and sitcoms. 
</p>

<p>What most people are missing is the fact that the President of the United States believes it's perfectly fine to detain United States Citizens indefinitely. No miranda, no trial, no charge, no anything afforded to YOU by the Bill Of Rights. 
</p>

<p>Some who are in the know have hope of a veto, but let's talk about that for a minute. The reason why Obama would veto it isn't the same reason WE want him to veto it. He wants unlimited power to detain people in an effort to stop terrorism. Read that last sentence again. He doesn't want to incarcerate people as a punishment for something, this is a preventative measure. He wants to imprison you, just because they SUSPECT that you MIGHT do something to harm this nation. The bill currently doesn't provide the President with unlimited power to stop a terrorist threat. This is why he will veto it, not because it will make the Constitution null and void. 
</p>




<p>You might be thinking, it's scary, but it doesn't affect me, I'm not a terrorist. Really? Well, if you speak against the US Gov't, you are defined as a terrorist (goodbye OWS). If you have more than seven (7) days worth of food in your house, you are a terrorist. If you have guns, you are a terrorist. Yes, my friend, pretty much any citizen of the U.S. is a terrorist using their definition. 
</p>

<P>
So, when I see people running this morning at the threat of arrest in Long Beach, I am saddened. We need to stop being a bunch of pussies, and stand up for ourselves and assert the rights our forefathers gave us so many years ago. Get arrested, file assault charges against the police to start internal affairs investigations and clog up the courts if you are abused. Don't back down! Egypt didn't, and they affected change. When that change didn't work, they revolted again. Russia- same thing. 
</P>
<img src="http://philbowyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/obama.jpg" alt="" title="obama" width="380"  />
<p>
Help me spread the word about the assault on America. Help people understand what is really going on. It's not about politics, it's about humanity. It's not about capitalism, it's about dignity. 
</p><p>
Help them understand that the immediate threat to our freedoms and safety isn't coming from a foreign enemy, but rather a domestic one. It's more powerful than Al-Qaeda. It controls a very powerful propaganda machine, it's well funded, and it's goes by the name, "<i>United States Government</i>". 
</p>
</div>
</section>
</article>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/obama-and-the-national-defense-authorization-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama Really Fighting For the Middle Class?</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/is-obama-really-fighting-for-the-middle-class/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/is-obama-really-fighting-for-the-middle-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Control Of Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his speech today, Obama made his case for the American middle class. Like a lot of his speeches, it sounds great until you really listen to it. Let's break this down... Today, America faces a make-or-break moment for the &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/is-obama-really-fighting-for-the-middle-class/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class=video>
<iframe width="800" height="462" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FDa3Gmq36wM?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<br />
<section>
<article class="blogPost">
<div>
<p>
In his speech today, Obama made his case for the American middle class. Like a lot of his speeches, it sounds great until you <i>really listen to it</i>. Let's break this down...
</p>

<p class=quote2>
Today, America faces a make-or-break moment for the middle class. 
</p><p class=quote2>
After the worst economic crisis of our lifetimes, some still want to return to the same policies that got us into this mess.  They’re the same policies that have stacked the deck against working Americans for too long.  They’re part of a philosophy that says we’re better off when everyone is left to fend for themselves and play by their own rules.
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">
President Obama has continued the bailouts, appointed the same people and hasn't helped to enact laws that help protect American citizens, even when the Democrats had control. He has been in office for 3 years now, and nothing has changed since Bush left office. He shifts the blame, but the fact is he himself has "returned to the same policies that got us into this mess and have stacked the deck against working Americans for too long".
</p>

<p class=quote2>
But I have a different vision.  I believe that we are greater together than we are on our own.  I believe that this country succeeds when everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone engages in fair play.
</p><p class=quote2>
To ensure fair play, last year, we passed the toughest financial reform in generations.
</p><p class=quote2>
See, for too long, the rules weren’t the same on Wall Street as they were on Main Street.  Risky bets were made with other people’s money.  Some folks made a lot of money taking advantage of consumers.  It was wrong.  And this irresponsible behavior on the part of some contributed to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
</p><p class=quote2>
So this financial reform refocuses the financial sector on what’s really important: getting capital to entrepreneurs who want to grow their businesses, and financing to millions of families who want to buy a house or send their kids to college. 
</p><p class=quote2>
A key part of that was putting in place the first-ever consumer watchdog – someone whose job it is to protect American families from being taken advantage of by mortgage lenders, payday lenders, and debt collectors. 
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">You mean the agency you hired Elizabeth Warren to set up, then didn't give her the job because she took the job too seriously?? That Agency? 
</p>

<img src="http://philbowyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/p120911ps-0370-2.jpg" alt="" title="p120911ps-0370-2" width="380" />

<p class=quote2>
Tens of millions of Americans use these services.  Protecting them from unscrupulous practices is an important job.  And that’s why I nominated Richard Cordray to serve as the head of this consumer watchdog agency.
</p><p class=quote2>
As the former Attorney General of Ohio, Richard helped recover billions of dollars on behalf of retirees and stood up to dishonest lending practices.  He has the support of most Attorneys General across the country, both Democrats and Republicans.  Members of Congress from both parties say he’s more than qualified for the job.  And yet on Thursday, Republicans blocked his nomination.  They refused to even allow it to come up for a vote.
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">Endorsed by other corrupted officials. What about the people? How about appointing someone that the people endorse. You know, the ones who you are supposed to be working for?? We would have endorsed Ms. Warren, and I guess that's the problem.
</p>


<p class=quote2>
That doesn’t make any sense.  Do Republicans in Congress think our financial crisis was caused by too much oversight of mortgage lenders or debt collectors?  Of course not.   And every day America has to wait for a new consumer protection watchdog is another day that dishonest businesses can target and take advantage of students, seniors, and service members. 
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">Republicans have done nothing but say no to everything since they reclaimed the majority. It's time to understand that, and if you were smart, you would tell the American people what is really going on. How they are playing games with policy, only agreeing to something if they get something in return, not because it's in the best interest of the United States. 
</p>


<p class=quote2>
So I refuse to take “no” for an answer.  Financial institutions have plenty of high-powered lawyers and lobbyists looking out for them.  It’s time consumers had someone on their side. 
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">Really? He isn't going to take no for an answer? The only thing he's been consistent on during his Presidency is taking no for the Republican's answer to everything.
</p>
<p class=quote2>
And while they’re at it, Republicans in Congress should stop the games and extend the payroll tax cut for working Americans. Because if they don’t, nearly 160 million Americans will see their taxes go up at the end of this month.   
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">They already said they would for a year, as long as the unemployment benefits get taken back to 52 weeks, and the pipeline goes through. Why aren't you exposing this Mr. President? 
</p>


<p class=quote2>
Congress can’t end the year by taking money out of the pockets of working Americans.  Now is not the time for playing politics.  Now is the time to do what’s right for the American people. 
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">So does this mean you will stop taking contributions from big corporations and stop working for them? Forgive me, but I think your full of it because you are still taking huge <strike>bribes</strike> contributions from the same people who put you where you are today. Let your record speak for itself and you wouldn't need to campaign. Oh, that's right, your record isn't so hot huh. 
</p>


<p class=quote2>
No one should go home for the holidays until we get this done.  So tell your Members of Congress, don’t be a Grinch.  Tell them to do the right thing for you and for our economy.  Thank you.
</p>

<p style="color:#E6D6C3">We've been telling you this for months through the Occupy protests that continue to be shut down. I'm not sure what we need to do or say to make our point heard. It's tough to get our voices heard when the people we elect to office literally run from us when we ask to speak with them. 
</p>

<p>What would you tell President Obama about his speech?</p>

</p>
</div>
</article>
</section>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/is-obama-really-fighting-for-the-middle-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving American Democracy Amendment</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/saving-american-democracy-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/saving-american-democracy-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Control Of Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saving American Democracy Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[" Warning that "American democracy in endangered," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today proposed a constitutional amendment to overturn a Supreme Court ruling that allowed unrestricted and secret campaign spending by corporations on U.S. elections." Senator Bernie Sanders has written a &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/saving-american-democracy-amendment/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section>
<article class="blogPost">
<div>
<p class=quote>"
Warning that "American democracy in endangered," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today proposed a constitutional amendment to overturn a Supreme Court ruling that allowed unrestricted and secret campaign spending by corporations on U.S. elections."
</p>
<P>
Senator Bernie Sanders has written a Constitutional Amendment that is designed to put an end to the corporate influence in our election process. 
</p>

<p>
The two-page proposed Amendment isn't very long and addresses several issues, including; ending corporate personhood, disallowing corporations to donate to campaigns, campaign finance reform and establishes that the Constitution does not protect corporations, but rather legislation by governments. It's a lot to pack in such a tiny document, and that's a problem.
</p>

<p>
With most of legislation that I read, these look good from the outside, but are written in a way that leaves many loopholes.  While I think Senator Sanders has a good rough draft, I don't think this is ready for prime-time. Let me walk you through the proposed Amendment:
</p>

<h2>Section 1</h2>
<p>
Section 1 establishes that "for-profit corporations, limited liability 
 companies, or other private entities established for business purposes or to promote business interests under the 
 laws of any state" do not have the same rights as people do under the Constitution. In other words, the Constitution does not apply to them. 
</p>

<p><strong>Problem:</strong> It's not specific enough. Where do sole-proprietors fall? What about non-profits? It doesn't explicitly "cover all the bases". </p>

<h2>Section 2</h2>
<p>This section says that rather than the Constitution governing Corporations and other "private entities", they are regulated by laws established by the state and federal governments. 
</p>

<p><strong>Problem:</strong>
No problem really, but it does make me wonder if we do need some sort of "Consitution For Business" to set some ground rules going forward. I know there are plenty of businesses taking advantage of the system, but there also many being penalized by the system too (just like people), so something similar to the Bill Of Rights would be appropriate to help our capitalistic endeavors on track.
</p>

<h2>Section 3</h2>
<p>Section 3 explicitly states that "corporate and other private entities" are not allowed to make contributions in any election for a candidate or ballot measure. 
</p>
<p><strong>Problem:</strong>
Too many loopholes. What if they hire an "employee" who donates money under his own name? There's no "what if they do" clause. What happens if these rules are broken? 
</p>
<h2>Section 4</h2>
<p>
Gives Congress the power to regulate the campaigns. How they are financed, limits on contributions, ect.
</p>
<p><strong>Problem:</strong>
It just gives them the power, but doesn't MAKE THEM do it. This Amendment should have explicitly reformed the way campaigning is handled, and provided limits on what can be donated (what's stopping a CEO from donating thousands under his name vs. his company name?). Just giving Congress the power creates the option to do nothing.
</p>


<h2>Summary (tl;dr)</h2>

<p>
I'm extremely disappointed in Mr. Sanders. He's been an outspoken advocate for the "people", but I'm afraid he's a lot like Obama - all bark no bite. This Amendment is useless when it comes to taking corporations of out of politics. It lacks specific rules and penalties and gives Congress the option to not act to put teeth into reforming the way campaigns are financed.
</p>

<p> The only thing this Amendment is good for is reversing the Citizens United ruling.</p>

<p><a href=http://sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/S.J.Res..pdf>Read the proposed Amendment for yourself</a>.</p>
</div>
</article>
</section>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/saving-american-democracy-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#gopmuppethearings</title>
		<link>http://philbowyer.com/gopmuppethearings/</link>
		<comments>http://philbowyer.com/gopmuppethearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muppets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbowyer.com/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox Business did a story on how the latest Muppet Movie is a tool to slam rich people and corporations. It's a ridiculous argument as you can tell from the video above, and typical of Fox to create something out &#8230; <a href="http://philbowyer.com/gopmuppethearings/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class=video>
<object width='800' height='462'><param name='movie' value='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf'></param><param name='flashvars' value='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201112020036'></param><param name='allowscriptaccess' value='always'></param><param name='allownetworking' value='all'></param><embed src='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' flashvars='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201112020036' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' width='800' height='462'></embed></object>
</div>


<p>
Fox Business did a story on how the latest Muppet Movie is a tool to slam rich people and corporations. It's a ridiculous argument as you can tell from the video above, and typical of Fox to create something out of nothing. 

</p><p>

The response however, has resulted in a very creative and hilarious reaction on Twitter, the <a href=https://twitter.com/#!/search/%23gopmuppethearings/>#GOPMuppetHearings</a>. 
</p><p>
We all need a good laugh with everything going on these days, so click that link and be amused.
</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philbowyer.com/gopmuppethearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

